In a thrilling encounter in the Uganda Premier League, URA emerged victorious over UPDF with a narrow 3-2 win in Match Round 5 at the URA Stadium. The match was filled with excitement, drama, and quality football from both sides, providing fans with a spectacle to remember.

The home team, URA, got off to a flying start as M. Aliro opened the scoring in the 24th minute with a well-taken goal, giving his side an early lead. However, UPDF responded quickly, with S. Kigozi finding the back of the net just two minutes later to level the score at 1-1.

As the first half progressed, URA regained their lead thanks to a goal from G. Masembe in the 44th minute, putting his team ahead 2-1 going into the halftime break. The match was finely poised, with both teams demonstrating their attacking intent and defensive resilience.

The second half saw UPDF fighting back once again, as S. Ssekamatte equalized in the 57th minute, making it 2-2 and setting the stage for a tense finale. However, it was URA who had the final say, with M. Aliro completing his brace in the 76th minute to give his team a crucial advantage at 3-2.

Despite UPDF’s best efforts to find an equalizer, URA held on to their lead until the final whistle, securing all three points and moving up the league table. The match showcased the competitive nature of the Uganda Premier League and the quality of football on display.

URA’s victory was a testament to their attacking prowess and ability to capitalize on their chances, while UPDF’s resilience and fighting spirit were evident throughout the match. Both teams can take positives from their performances, but it was URA who emerged victorious in this closely contested encounter.

With this result, URA continues their strong start to the season, while UPDF will be looking to bounce back in their upcoming fixtures. Football fans were treated to an entertaining and action-packed match, highlighting the excitement and unpredictability of the beautiful game.

Line-ups:

URA

UPDF

Substitutions:

URA

UPDF

Ball possession:

In a tightly contested match between URA and UPDF, both teams exhibited a strong defensive display resulting in a goalless draw. The ball possession was evenly split between the two sides, with URA and UPDF each having 0% of the possession.

Despite their efforts, URA failed to register any shots on target or on goal throughout the match. The lack of attacking threat from URA was evident, as they struggled to break down the UPDF defense.

On the other hand, UPDF also failed to trouble the URA goalkeeper, as they were unable to produce any shots on target or on goal. The UPDF team, although solid in their defensive organization, lacked the cutting edge in the final third to test the URA defense.

The player who was the most active in terms of the number of shots taken remains unnamed, as both teams struggled to create clear-cut opportunities in front of goal.

In terms of hits on goal, the standout performer was not specified. Both teams were unable to capitalize on their limited chances, resulting in a stalemate at the final whistle.

Overall, it was a match characterized by strong defensive performances from both URA and UPDF, with neither team able to make a breakthrough in the attacking third. The lack of goal-scoring opportunities meant that the match ended in a goalless draw, leaving both teams with a point apiece.

Passes:

In a highly anticipated clash between URA and UPDF, both teams failed to make an impact in terms of passing accuracy and key passes. The match ended in a stalemate, with neither side managing to register a single completed pass or a key pass throughout the game.

URA, known for their possession-based style of play, struggled to find their rhythm as their pass accuracy stood at a disappointing 0%. Despite their efforts, they were unable to create any meaningful opportunities in the final third, with the absence of key passes highlighting their lack of creativity on the day.

On the other hand, UPDF also struggled with their passing game, matching URA’s pass accuracy of 0%. With no successful passes to show for their efforts, UPDF failed to break down their opponents and were unable to carve out any clear-cut chances in front of goal.

The lack of quality in passing and creativity was evident throughout the match, as both teams failed to produce the attacking football that fans had hoped for. URA and UPDF will need to work on their passing accuracy and key pass statistics if they are to improve their performances in future fixtures.

Overall, it was a disappointing display from both sides as they failed to make an impact with their passing game. The stalemate serves as a reminder of the importance of precision and creativity in football, and both URA and UPDF will be looking to bounce back stronger in their next outings.

Defense:

In a tightly contested match between URA and UPDF, both teams displayed remarkable defensive prowess, with a focus on interceptions and blocks throughout the game. Despite the high intensity of the match, neither team recorded any interceptions, emphasizing the disciplined defensive structures in place.

Both URA and UPDF showcased a solid defensive performance, with their players executing crucial blocks to deny their opponents scoring opportunities. The backlines of both teams remained resolute, thwarting attacking plays and nullifying potential threats.

While the statistics may not reflect a high number of interceptions, the quality of defensive actions from both URA and UPDF was evident. Players demonstrated excellent positioning, anticipation, and timing to disrupt opposition attacks and maintain a compact defensive shape.

Overall, the match was a testament to the defensive capabilities of both teams, with interceptions and blocks playing a key role in keeping the scoreline level. Despite the lack of statistical dominance in interceptions, the defensive efforts of URA and UPDF were commendable, showcasing a keen focus on defensive solidity and organization.

Face-to-face:

In a fiercely contested match between URA and UPDF, both teams showcased their tenacity and determination as they battled for possession in numerous face-to-face duels throughout the game.

The leaders in the teams when it came to engaging in these intense battles for the ball were (0) URA and (0) UPDF . Their players demonstrated exceptional skill and physicality as they fought tooth and nail to gain control of the midfield.

Despite the high number of face-to-face fights for the ball, neither team was able to break the deadlock, with both defenses holding firm under the pressure. URA’s organized backline thwarted UPDF’s attacking efforts, while UPDF’s defenders put in a resilient performance to keep URA at bay.

The midfield battle was particularly intense, with players from both sides showing great determination and commitment in winning possession and dictating the tempo of the game. The match was a true test of character for both teams, with neither willing to give an inch in their pursuit of victory.

In the end, the match ended in a hard-fought draw, a result that reflected the evenly matched contest between URA and UPDF. Both teams can take pride in their performance, knowing that they left everything on the pitch in their quest for supremacy.

Overall, it was a compelling and enthralling encounter that showcased the competitive spirit and skill of both URA and UPDF. Fans were treated to a thrilling display of football, with the outcome hanging in the balance until the final whistle.

Пенальти в матче:

• M. Aliro (URA) at 76 minute
• S. Ssekamatte (UPDF) at 57 minute

The last five games (including this match):

• URA –
• UPDF –

Top 5 Uganda Premier League scorers:

1. (0, )
2. (0, )
3. (0, )
4. (0, )
5. (0, )

Next games:

• URA will play with Maroons. November 05 at 13:00 (GMT), on Luzira Maximum Prisons Stadium.
• UPDF will play with Police. November 06 at 13:00 (GMT), on Bombo Stadium.