In the wake of contentious diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies enacted by several states, including Florida’s recent decision to eliminate DEI initiatives, Black athletes are considering a powerful form of protest by avoiding schools in states that have implemented such measures.

The potential boycott is reminiscent of a historic protest recounted by attendees of the funeral of Willie Ray Smith Sr., a revered Texas high school football coach. Smith, known for his staunch stance against racial injustice, notably refused to allow his players to join white southern college football teams that discriminated against Black athletes. Instead, he directed them towards northern institutions, such as Michigan State, in a symbolic act akin to an “athletic underground railroad.”

The recent controversy surrounding DEI initiatives, particularly in Florida where Governor Ron DeSantis spearheaded the removal of such programs, has sparked outrage from prominent figures like Emmitt Smith, a celebrated NFL player and alum of the University of Florida. Smith condemned the decision, highlighting the necessity of diverse perspectives in higher education.

While Smith did not outline a specific course of action, his sentiments echo those of Willie Ray Smith Sr., suggesting that Black athletes and their families could refuse to engage with institutions that fail to support diversity and inclusion.

The potential impact of such a boycott is significant, particularly for universities heavily reliant on revenue generated by Black athletes. Schools like the University of Florida, where football and basketball programs are predominantly composed of Black players, could face financial repercussions if recruits choose to attend institutions elsewhere.

Moreover, the boycott could serve as a poignant reminder of the indispensable contributions of Black athletes to collegiate sports and the broader university community. By following in the footsteps of trailblazers like Willie Ray Smith Sr., young Black athletes have the opportunity to effect meaningful change and challenge regressive policies in higher education.